翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Doe Avedon
・ Doe B
・ Doe Bank
・ Doe Bay, Washington
・ Doe Boy
・ Doe Boy Fresh
・ Doe Boyland
・ Doe Branch Post Office
・ DOE Bridge over Laramie River
・ Doe Castle
・ Doe Ching
・ Doe Creek
・ Doe Deer
・ Doe District
・ DoE e-center
Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia
・ Doe Gully, West Virginia
・ Doe Hill Mountain
・ Doe Hill, Virginia
・ Doe Island State Park
・ Doe Lake (Parry Sound District)
・ Doe language
・ Doe Lea
・ Doe Lea Viaduct
・ Doe Maar
・ Doe Memorial Library
・ Doe Nunatak
・ Doe or Die
・ Doe Paoro
・ Doe people


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia : ウィキペディア英語版
Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia

''Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia'', 489 F.3d 376 (D.C. Cir. 2007), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, written by Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, in which the Court upheld a 2003 District of Columbia statute that stated the conditions for authorizing a non-emergency surgical procedure on a mentally incompetent person. This case developed out of an appeal to a district court decision that was brought on behalf of two mentally incompetent patients who were subject to an abortion without their consent and another patient who was subject to an eye surgery without her consent. The appellate case had the result of upholding the statute's constitutional legality of applying two separate categories of rights to incompetent persons. Under the Appellate Court's interpretation of the statute, a court located in the District of Columbia, must apply the "best interest of the patient" standard to a person who was never competent, and the court must apply the "known wishes of the patient" standard to a person who was once competent. The appellate decision was remanded back to the District Court and the case is still ongoing.
==Background==
The following is the background of the case according to the Notes in the 2002 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Notes were citing the Complaint. "In 1978, defendants allegedly gave their consent for an abortion to be performed on plaintiff Jane Doe III, without consulting with Jane Doe III's legal representative and without obtaining substituted judgment from a court. Compl. ¶¶ 19-21. In 1984, defendants allegedly took the same action in regard to plaintiff Jane Doe I. Compl. ¶¶ 12-15. In 1994, defendants allegedly gave their consent for an elective surgical procedure to be performed on plaintiff Jane Doe II's eye, without consulting with Jane Doe II's mother who was also Jane Doe II's court-appointed advocate. Compl. ¶¶ 16-18."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.